Secrets of the Aether

Aether Structures in Light? Who would have thought?

2010-01-18T10:03:00.000-06:00

The Aether Physics Model induces the geometry of a quantum Aether unit as a tubular loxodrome. The Aether unit encapsulates dark matter to produce electrons and protons. The Aether unit also carries angular momentum from electrons and positrons, which is a photon. That is, photons have the geometry of Aether units.

Naturally, it was just a matter of time before scientists discovered that photons and light have the geometry of Aether units. That is exactly what appears to be the case as posted in a recent article on Live Science. The so-called "knots" are identical to Aether unit geometry.

In an earlier story on Live Science, it was shown that light in nanoscale structures exhibits force. This is evidence for the electron-positron angular momentum stored in photons. The electron-positron angular momentum activates the Aether's electrostatic and electromagnetic dipoles. By manipulating the angles of photons, one can create both attractive and repulsive forces between photons.

New Interferometer Experiment

2009-10-24T16:35:00.003-05:00

There is a new video on YouTube demonstrating the Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. The interferometer experiment replicates earlier designs, except the laser is rotated in the vertical plane in addition to the horizontal plane.

The Aether Physics Model quantifies the Aether as the container of matter. Therefore, where there is denser matter there is also greater Aether density. The greater the Aether density, the more time it will take for light to travel a given distance.

The Michelson-Morley experiment rotated in the horizontal plane. This meant the interferometer was rotating through an even Aether density. Dayton Miller later performed the same experiments on top of Mount Wilson and measured a definite (but small) Aether drift. For technical reasons, early interferometers could not be rotated in the vertical plane.

The mindless skeptics are already dismissing the experiment as a flexing of the metal table, which is absurd. As more people replicate the vertical rotating interferometer, the results will begin accumulating and the skeptics will be forever dismissed.

According to the Aether Physics Model, this experiment should also work on the Moon and even the space station. Further, the number of peaks in the interference pattern should decrease proportional to the mass of the body the experiment is performed near. Even further, the number of peaks should decrease with an increase in distance away from the center of mass.

I'm not yet sure of the experimenter's name, but I will be following up on this story. This will be one of the biggest breakthrough experiments of all time in fundamental physics.

Hot Fusion Confusion

2009-05-26T09:21:00.002-05:00

When researchers demonstrate cold fusion in their labs with real data, they are derided as being delusional cranks who don't understand physics. When hot fusion researchers spend a billion dollars on the brightest scientists and top technology to produce the theoretical hot fusion of the Standard Model and get zero results, then progress is being made because the money was successfully spent.

The New York Times released an article on May 26, 2009 titled In Hot Pursuit of Fusion (or Folly).

In February, NIF fired its 192 beams into its target chamber for the first time, and it now has the world’s most powerful laser, as well as the largest optical instrument ever built. But raising its energies still further to the point of ignition could take a year or more of experimentation and might, officials concede, prove daunting and perhaps impossible.

For all the hype about the success of the Standard Model, it is failing spectacularly. Billions of dollars, thousands of top scientists, and years of research and engineering are being wasted on Gravitational Wave detectors (I detect gravity waves with home built equipment) and Hot Fusion ignition.

The Aether Physics Model clearly shows fusion is actually a proton version of the Casimir effect. Two protons, held a quantum distance apart and magnetically aligned, cause the intervening Aether to oscillate and absorb a proton's quantity of dark matter to produce a proton. The initial state of this new creation is a proton-sized photon. In the Sun's corona, these photons radiate away as light. When the process occurs inside an atom, the photon is converted to a proton and actually increases the amount of matter in the Universe. Hence, stars literally grow in size, as do planets and other bodies in the Universe.

Plants and animals routinely convert atoms from one element to another via biological transmutations. By exchanging hydrogen and oxygen nuclei, plants and animals manufacture the elements they need by manipulating the atoms' geometry. That is why it takes so little heat for simple life forms to fuse or break apart atoms.

Simple life forms apparently have the ability to manipulate atomic structures. To compare the approach of a simple life form to a Standard Model scientist, the simple life form unlocks a padlock with a key, whereas the scientist attempts to blow it open with dynamite. The Aether Physics Model shows us the approach to atomic structures that nature uses, whereas the approach of the Standard Model is strictly destructive.

The Standard Model of physics does not recognize the geometry of subatomic particles or atoms. All matter is considered to be a trade off between the dimension of mass and the unit of energy. The Standard Model is merely a poetic theory, as opposed to the discrete theory of the Aether Physics Model.

Quantum Entanglement or Primary Angular Momentum

2009-05-19T16:30:00.006-05:00

Photonics.com has published an article on quantum entanglement. Basically, they are saying quantum entanglement is modeled based upon the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP). The HUP is based upon Planck's constant, which in the Aether Physics Model, refers to a quantum quantity of primary angular momentum. When this quantum of primary angular momentum remains in a single Aether unit, it is a subatomic particle. When it explodes outward, it is an expanding wave of primary angular momentum and is called a photon.

The observation of Quantum Entanglement is evidence in favor of the APM model of the photon. According to the APM, the photon does not leave its source until its expanded angular momentum contacts another object, which then absorbs it.

The image shown comes from the photonics article. The depiction of quantum entanglement looks so similar to the expected photon of the Aether, that one must assume the two concepts are describing the same phenomenon.

The Standard Model derives the quantum entanglement idea from a mathematical probability theory, whereas the APM derives the photon structure from discrete physics.

Aether in Space is Fluid

2009-05-02T09:04:00.004-05:00

The Aether Physics Model quantifies all space as Aether. The Aether has a quantum state, which is a quantum rotating magnetic field. The quantum Aether unit behaves like a solid, whereas the aggregate of Aether units behaves as fluid and gas. When excited, the Aether also behaves as a plasma.

Magnetic and electrostatic fields are structures of Aether units. These structures can be nanoscale small, or galactically huge. As space science develops, we are seeing more evidence demonstrating the electric and magnetic effects that Aether exhibits among planets, star systems, and galaxies.

UC Berkeley News reports that magnetic tornadoes have been observed in space. The THEMIS probe cluster has orbited through these magnetic tornadoes, which interact electrically with the Earth. Auroras are one manifestation of the magnetic tornadoes in space.

According to the UC Berkeley article, "Space tornadoes, however, generate huge amounts of electrical currents inside the funnel. These currents flow along twisted magnetic field lines from space into the ionosphere where they power several processes..."

Mainstream science tells us the Aether does not exist because it is not physical. However, mainstream science talks about "electrical currents" and "twisted magnetic field lines" as though they were physical objects. It is true that flowing electrons and charged particles can behave with the property of current, but current is not a physical object of itself. Also, magnetic field lines are considered by mainstream science to be mathematical structures, not physical structures. Like the Aether, magnetic flux lines are non-material. Students of the Aether Physics Model clearly understand that magnetic flux lines are Aether structures. So the acknowledgement of the reality of magnetic flux lines is the acknowledgement of the reality of Aether!

Mainstream science tells us there is no such thing as Aether, even though scientists talk about magnetic and electric structures as though they were physical objects. The more science learns the truth about existence, the closer they are getting to returning to the Aether theories of the past. How much more strain can mainstream science take before they are forced to recognize the Aether Physics Model?

Another Experiment Supports the APM

2009-01-08T22:09:00.002-06:00

Osborn told physicsworld.com that the S± symmetry has “profound consequences for the nature of the pairing interaction”. Unlike the BCS interaction, which is attractive over short distances, Osborn says that S+- symmetry implies that the pairing mechanism in their superconductor is repulsive at short distances and attractive at longer distances. “That’s important information for theorists”, he said, but cautioned “it doesn’t say what the precise mechanism actually is”.

The above quote comes from the linked article at Physicsworld.com titled, "Iron-based superconductors really are different." As in the Casimir effect, the magnetic effects are due to the strong charge orientations of the subatomic particles. The subatomic particle orientation is dictated by the physical structure of the atom. Hence, different atoms at different temperatures (distributed velocity) can have net magnetic north orientation, net magnetic south orientation, or net zero (neutral) magnetic orientation.

If the scientists would like to know what the precise mechanism actually is, they need to read Secrets of the Aether.

Mainstream Discovers APM Prediction of Casimir Effect

2009-01-08T21:54:00.002-06:00

Mainstream science is finally catching on. The Aether Physics Model predicts the Casimir force is the strong force law of the electron. The strong force is the force acting on strong charge, which has both magnetic north and south polarity. Naturally, the strong force law (Casimir equation) works for both attractive and repulsive magnetic alignments. To see how the APM unifies all the forces read our Unified Force Theory paper. To understand the basics of the theory, read our Foundation paper.

Antimatter is Gravitationally Repulsive

2008-06-12T10:43:00.002-05:00

In an article on NewScientist, there are two proposals to detect whether antimatter is gravitationally repulsive to matter, or not. Fermilab in Chicago and CERN in Switzerland are proposing experiments, which they hope will detect the gravitational relationship of matter and antimatter.

The Aether Physics Model induces that matter and antimatter must be gravitationally repulsive. This can be determined from the observation that two photons can join together to produce a positron-electron pair. Positrons and electrons are massive particles with the same mass, but opposite spins. The two photons must be the source of the angular momentum needed to produce these two particles, which means the right and left spin must already exist in the photon in quantities equal to half the mass of the electron and half the mass of the positron.

Standard Model theory denies the existence of Aether. Yet, the Aether provides the quantifiable structure needed for understanding how electron and positron angular momentum can coexist in the same photon.

The photon and Aether structures are geometrically identical. If the positron and electron angular momentum coexist in an Aether unit, and the photon has zero mass, then in order for two photons to produce a positron-electron pair the positron and electron masses must be opposite and therefore be gravitationally repulsive.

Further evidence of antimatter repulsiveness is observed in positron clouds drifting through space. The only way positron clouds could congregate in the wide spaces is if they were repelled from normal matter at great distances. Although gravity is a weak force, it works at great distances.

This is one experiment I would like Fermilab and CERN to get funding for. Not only could it provide strong evidence in favor of the Aether Physics Model, but it could also reveal a great weakness of General Relativity theory.

Gravitational Waves Detected

2008-06-02T19:19:00.002-05:00

The magnetic scalar wave detector is a success! We have captured our first gravitational wave with its associated gamma ray burst. The raw data is available online and is accessible from the Magnetic Scalar Waves page. An Excel spreadsheet lists the exact gravitational wave times along with the GRB time.

In the future, there will likely be gravitational waves listed and no associated gamma ray burst. This is because not all GRBs can be detected due to interference from the Sun, Earth, and Moon. Also, there are occasional satellite equipment malfunctions due to changes in the space environment.

We are presently looking for a theoretical physics partner who is affiliated with a University or professional lab/observatory. If you are interested in collaborating with us, please contact David Thomson through the profile link in the right column.

Magnetic Scalar Wave Detector

2008-05-12T15:38:00.000-05:00

For years, I have been observing solar and gamma ray burst (GRB) data. GRBs are bursts of high energy gamma photons, which mostly are produced by supernovas throughout the Universe. According to the Aether Physics Model, when the core of a star becomes too dense, it implodes briefly as a black hole implosion event. After a few minutes or hours, the implosion process is complete and no black hole remains. In fact, the surrounding Aether (space-time) rushes in to fill the void and then rebounds with a magnetic tsunami that radiates all across the Universe. At the same time, the distances between subatomic particles change such that the Casimir effect comes into play big time. As old matter is collapsing, new matter is being generated via the Casimir effect.

This new matter manifests first as photons. There are so many of them produced at once and in succession, that they possess what is called gamma ray energy levels. The magnetic tsunami and GRB race across the Universe, together. Most of the time, the gravity waves travel faster than the gamma rays. Eventually, the magnetic tsunami will arrive at the Sun and cause a peculiar pattern of solar x-ray spikes.

Modern physics prefers to explain everything in terms of mass, energy, and gravity. Thus, the magnetic tsunami is called a gravity wave by modern physics. They are both one and the same, but orthogonal views of each other as explained by the APM.

This week, I have built a magnetic scalar wave detector, which measures the time the magnetic tsunamis (gravity waves) impact the Earth. Today, May 12, we had our first magnetic tsunami pass through since I was recording data. The new magnetic scalar wave detector detected the gravity waves. Other data support this conclusion.

Further, it appears this magnetic scalar wave detector also detects lightning and possibly detects earthquake precursor signals. A brief presentation of the data and the raw data file is available at:
http://www.16pi2.com/magnetic_scalar_waves.htm

This is an important scientific discovery with many implications for science and saving lives. Let us get the message out so that the scientific community has to listen to us and take this Aether Physics Model seriously.

Aether Density Evident in Satellite Motion

2008-02-29T15:41:00.002-06:00

Space scientists have been perplexed by slight anomalies in satellite motion beginning with the Pioneer spacecraft, and now with five other satellites, which are using the Earth to slingshot them into space.

The Aether Physics Model shows that space-time is a fabric of quantum Aether units. Near massive bodies, such as the Sun and Earth, this Aether fabric is stretched inward toward the mass. This effect is caused at the subatomic level when electrons and protons bind to produce neutrons. In neutron binding, Aether units are folded over on top of each other such that two Aether units occupy the same space as one normal Aether unit. It is like pinching a rubber sheet. The result is that the surrounding space-time fabric becomes stretched inward toward the neutron.

This means that just outside of a massive body, the Aether is stretched very thin. The further away from the massive body one travels, the less stretched space-time is since the stretching effect is spread over a greater volume.

The planet Mercury is very close to the Sun. The Sun is pulling a lot of the Aether fabric toward it. This means that the space-time in Mercury's orbit is thinner than in the space-time of Earth and other planets. Less space-time to travel through means Mercury will show an apparent precession compared to the predictions of Newton's gravitational law.

Apparently, the stretching of the Aether is not homogenous. It would seem that at the edge of the Sun's gravitational influence on the surrounding Aether fabric, space-time is denser than is expected, which is why scientists see the Pioneer anomaly. Actually, the "anomaly" is not with the Pioneer's motion, but is caused by the physics used to predict the satellite's motion.

The same situation applies to satellites buzzing the Earth. The Aether surrounding the Earth is less dense than the Aether in interplanetary space. Due to the expectations of General Relativity theory and Newton's gravitational law, satellites appear to have an anomalous acceleration as they pass by the Earth.

If modern physics would research and quantify the Aether, in which the satellites move, space physicists could eliminate these unexpected "anomalies."

LIGO Can't See Gravity Waves

2008-01-05T08:18:00.000-06:00

In a recent article on Space Daily:

"The interferometer is constructed in such a way that it can detect a change of less than a thousandth the diameter of an atomic nucleus in the lengths of the arms relative to each other.
"On February 1, 2007, the Konus-Wind, Integral, Messenger, and Swift gamma-ray satellites measured a short but intense outburst of energetic gamma rays originating in the direction of M31, the Andromeda galaxy, located 2.5 million light-years away. ...
"During the intense blast of gamma rays, known as GRB070201, the 4-km and 2-km gravitational-wave interferometers at the Hanford facility were in science mode and collecting data. They did not, however, measure any gravitational waves in the aftermath of the burst.
"That non-detection was itself significant.
"The burst had occurred along a line of sight that was consistent with it originating from one of Andromeda's spiral arms, and a binary coalescence event--the merger of two neutron stars or black holes, for example--was considered among the most likely explanations. Such a monumental cosmic event occurring in a nearby galaxy should have generated gravitational waves that would be easily measured by the ultrasensitive LIGO detectors.
"The absence of a gravitational-wave signal meant GRB070201 could not have originated in this way in Andromeda..."

The LIGO system is designed within a four-dimensional frame of reference. Yet the Aether, which gravitational waves propagate through, is a five-dimensional structure. It is like expecting someone looking through a standard video camera to see with three dimensional vision into a room. The video camera transforms the reality of the three dimensional (volume) room into a two-dimensional (area) perspective. For example, if through the video camera we wanted to see behind an object in our view, we cannot move our head sideways to look behind the object. We are limited to the position and design of the video camera.

Similarly, the LIGO system was designed by people who deny the existence of Aether and don't understand its five-dimensional (space-resonance) structure. This prevents the apparatus
(interferometer) from being designed properly and does not give the scientist the impetus to wonder what is behind the four-dimensional (space-time) world we see. The five-dimensional reality of the Aether looks upon our four-dimensional perspective much like our four-dimensional (space-time) perspective looks at a three-dimensional (area-time) TV monitor.

Being in a higher dimensional reality, we can see the limitations of lower dimensional reality, but lower dimensional reality must use its imagination to understand higher dimensional reality.

Isn't it amazing that instead of assuming or questioning the validity of their physics, the scientists simply assume there is something wrong with the Universe? They know there should be gravitational waves, but because they cannot detect them, they assume the gravitational waves are not there. Yet, the Sun shows us signs of gravitational waves over 100 times a year. These gravitational wave signatures are always associated with gamma ray bursts.

The Aether Physics Model is a properly quantified theory of the Aether, derived entirely from empirical measurements and constants. This theory clearly shows us that the Aether is non-material, five-dimensional, and very real. We even directly observe the behavior of the Aether as magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, solitons, phonons, frame dragging, and other non-material phenomena. Scientists simply turn their backs on the Aether Physics Model because they have convinced themselves there is no Aether.

How did they convince themselves the Aether does not exist? They used an interferometer to prove the Aether does not exist. They use the same concept to attempt to detect gravity waves. And despite having their satellites in space for over two years, they have not yet detected a single gravity wave, which was predicted by Einstein's General Relativity theory.

The Aether Physics Model also supports the existence of gravity waves, but not in the four-dimensional reality that the interferometer is built. The gravity waves exist in space-resonance, which has three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency. Space resonance is the same reality the Aether and photons exist in.

It is interesting that the same device that was used to disprove the Aether cannot detect the gravity waves that General Relativity theory predicts, and General Relativity theory was supposed to explain the Universe without Aether. Now, because the LIGO interferometer cannot detect gravity waves associated with gamma ray bursts, it is assumed that gamma ray bursts do not produce gravity waves, even though we can clearly see a gravity wave signature in the solar x-ray flux data every time a gamma ray burst is detected. Modern science is clearly leading us head on into a brick wall.

The Aether by a Different Name

2007-09-07T10:33:00.000-05:00

Below is a recent article by the American Institute of Physics.

"The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in effect a quantum
dot."

This is how science talks about the observable Aether without admitting it exists. They simply change the name. Other examples of observable and manipulable Aether are "magnetic field," "electric field," "gravitational field," "spin," "phonon," and "frame dragging." There are even more examples.

How is it that science claims the Aether cannot exist, and yet they describe the properties of "tiny regions" that can remain static and also move?

Also, notice how they can create longitudinal waves with these "tiny regions." Acoustic waves are longitudinal waves. Longitudinal waves can only occur in a medium of some sort. That medium is the Aether.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: physnews@aip.org [mailto:physnews@aip.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:03 AM
> Subject: Physics News Update 838
>
>
> PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
> The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
> Number 838 September 7, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
> www.aip.org/pnu
>
> ACOUSTIC QUANTUM DOTS. A new experiment at the Cavendish Lab
> at the University of Cambridge is the first to controllably
> shuttle electrons around a chip and observe their quantum
> properties. A quantum dot restricts electrons to a region of
> space in a semiconductor so tiny as to be essentially
> zero-dimensional. This in turn enforces a quantum regime;
> the electron may only have certain discrete energies, which
> can be useful, depending on the circumstances, for producing
> laser light or for use in detectors and maybe even future computers.
> A quantum dot is usually made not by carving the
> semiconductor into a tiny grain but rather by imposing
> restrictions on the electron*s possible motions by the
> application of voltages to nearby electrodes. This would be
> a static quantum dot. It is also possible to make dynamic
> quantum dots-that is, moving dots that are created by the
> passage of surface acoustic waves (SAWs) moving through a
> narrow channel across the plane of a specially designed
> circuit chip (see figure at http://www.aip.org/png/2007/289.htm).
> The acoustic wave itself is generated by applying microwaves
> to interleaved fingered electrodes atop a piezoelectric
> material like GaAs. The applied electric fields between
> finger-electrodes induce a sound wave to propagate along the
> surface of the material.
> These acoustic waves have the ability to scoop electrons and
> chauffeur them along the surface.
> The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in
> effect a quantum dot. Such acoustic-based dynamic quantum
> dots have made before, but according to Cambridge researcher
> Michael Astley (mra28@cam.ac.uk), this is the first time the
> tunneling of the electrons (even single electrons) into and
> out of the quantum dots has been observed. This is an
> important part of the whole electron-shuttling process since
> one wants control over the electron motions and spins. If,
> moreover, electrons in two very close acoustic wave channels
> could be entangled, then this would present the chance to
> make a sort of flying qubit, which could be at the heart of a
> quantum computer. (Astley et al., Physical Review Letters,
> upcoming article; lab website at
> http://www.sp.phy.cam.ac.uk/SPWeb/research/SAWQC/research.html#SAWQC)
>

SSE 2007 Conference

2007-05-06T18:02:00.000-05:00

I have been accepted to present the Electron Binding Energy equation at the Society for Scientific Exploration 2007 annual conference at the end of May. I will explain the structure of the EBE equation and show the latest success at predicting all the ground state electron binding energies. Not only does the equation predict all the ground state binding energies with reasonable accuracy, but it also appears to have uncovered a slight correction for the nitrogen ground state binding energy, in particular.

According to Gwyn Williams, a noted expert on electron binding energies, there are at least two experiments, which provide different binding energies than the presently accepted one. The present nitrogen grounds state is listed at 409.9eV, yet two other studies give 401.9eV and 403eV. According to my equation, the nitrogen ground state binding energy should be 403.9eV.

The SSE 2007 conference is open to the public for all who wish to attend.

After the SSE conference, I have been invited to another private conference to meet with top scientists developing the Electric Universe model. Whereas the Electric Universe model is the electric version of cosmology, the Aether Physics Model is the electric version of quantum physics. As many of you familiar with the APM know, General Relativity theory specifically has an electric counterpart in the Aether Physics Model.

Although my key registration and transportation expenses have already been paid by a generous supporter of Quantum AetherDynamics Institute, I still must raise funds for travel expenses for ten days. Anybody wishing to make a tax deductible donation to QADI may do so at NetworkForGood.org, or the PayPal button on the home page.

This marks another milestone in the development of the Aether Physics Model.

Does the Higgs Boson Exist?

2007-04-24T09:33:00.000-05:00

In the February 2001 edition of the AIP's Physics News Update, it was stated:

Fermilab's Tevatron machine will resume its operations in March 2001 and will run for five years, and it too will search for the Higgs. Fermilab can, in principle, search for Higgs's as massive as 180 GeV, but CERN's efforts will have helped Fermilab, at least at first, in sifting the incoming returns for signs of the Higgs. With its new higher luminosity (essentially the intensity of the beams), the Tevatron should be able to produce about 10¹⁵ proton-antiproton collisions.

It has now been over 5 years and this is this week's summary of the Higgs boson search:

"Physicists from Fermilab’s Tevatron collider have just reported their most comprehensive summary yet of physics at the highest laboratory energies. At last week’s American Physical Society (APS) meeting in Jacksonville, Florida they delivered dozens of papers on a spectrum of topics, many of which are related in some way to the Higgs boson."

In short, they still have not found it.

"The Higgs is the cornerstone ingredient in the standard model of high energy physics. It is the particle manifestation of the curious mechanism that kicked in at an early moment in the life of the universe: the W and Z bosons (the carriers of the weak force) became endowed with mass while the photon (the carrier of the electromagnetic force) did not. This asymmetry makes the two forces very different in the way they operate in the universe."

Notice how the Higgs is believed to become endowed with mass, but no physical process is identified, neither is there any definition of what "mass" is. Then they say that the photon does not have mass and claim it is the carrier of the electromagnetic force.

First off, the mass and charge are defined specifically as dimensions in the Aether Physics Model. Mass and charge are no more particulate than length or time. But just as there is a finite distance between your eyes and your computer monitor, which can be accurately measured, there is no such particulate thing as "length" which is there to measure. Length is a form of non-material reality, which is measurable and thus real. Mass, charge, and time are similarly different forms of non-material reality.

The Higgs boson is a theoretical construct needed by the Standard Model to complete the theory. Unfortunately, the Standard Model is based upon the wrong understanding of what mass and charge are, so the predicted particles are nothing more than fantasies. Even the W and Z bosons have never been observed. All that has been observed are specific calculated energies, which have been explained in a dimensionless mathematical model and interpreted as "particles." In the Aether Physics Model, the weak force is the proportion of the electrostatic charge to the strong charge. However, the Standard Model does not recognize the strong charge, even though it easily expresses mathematically as the angular momentum of the subatomic particle times the conductance of the Aether.

There is no Higgs boson. All that exists is billions of dollars of wasted taxpayer money, thousands of theoretical papers, and a bunch of physicists praying they will find it soon so they can justify more than 20 years of expensive and time consuming research.

The Aether Physics Model provides the correct understanding of sub-quantum structure, which is a non-material form of reality. Mass is nothing more than a dimension, albeit a very real dimension. In order to understand mass, one has to break away from the concept that physical reality is an ever decreasing size of physical particle. It is as though modern physicists intend to understand the Universe by creating a sharper knife.

The reality is that physical existence arose from non-material existence, as the physics of the Aether Physics Model clearly reveals.

Still Room for New Knowledge

2007-04-05T10:23:00.000-05:00

A recent article on Space.com highlights (once again) the incomplete nature of modern physics theories and astrophysics theories. As I show on one of my web pages, other stellar examples do not agree with modern theory, either. In the article about "light echos," I show with NASA's own photos that the light echo theory is flawed. Apparently, the scale of distance used by NASA is far from accurate.

In the article about the Luminous Blue Variable star explosion in galaxy UGC 4904, we at least get a direct admission that modern theory doesn't work, rather than some lame concept like "light echoes."

A recently-observed supernova is making some astrophysicists doubt prevailing theories for how stars die.
The massive star, located in galaxy UGC 4904 about 77 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Lynx, threw off a huge amount of material on October 20, 2004. This star, which may have been what's known as a Luminous Blue Variable (LBV), was mistaken for a supernova, as LBV's often are. In fact, some observers refer to them as "supernova imposters."
Then, in the fall of 2006, the star exploded into a full supernova, much sooner than expected. Dubbed Supernova 2006jc, the dying star's blast wave apparently reached the shell of drifting material released in the earlier outburst in mere hours.
The wave heated the ejected gases to millions of degrees, sparking X-ray emissions of an intensity and duration never before detected. NASA’s Swift satellite recorded X-rays brightening from the supernova for an unprecedented 100 days. All previously observed supernovae have initially appeared bright in X-rays before quickly turning invisible.
"We have never observed a stellar outburst and then later seen the star explode," said University of California at Berkeley astronomer Ryan Foley.

First of all, is a "blast wave" a technical term? What is the blast wave made out of that it can heat ejected gases to millions of degrees and spark super intense X-ray emissions? If the X-ray emissions are secondary, and the "blast wave" struck matter to produce X-rays, then the "blast wave" cannot be made out of photons or matter. In order for the so-called "blast wave" to move so fast it had to be a gravity wave (a ripple in the fabric of space-time, or Aether).

Not only did this "blast wave" excite X-rays in its own debris field, but when the "blast wave" arrived at our Sun it also produced x-rays on it, too. The so-called blast waves are gravity waves, and they often travel faster than the speed of light. So in this case, our Sun released intense bursts of X-ray flares more than a day before the associated gamma ray burst from the LBV reached our Sun as seen in the solar X-ray flare graph below (click on image to see full size):

Scientists at Caltech and MIT have spent lots of NSF money building a gravity wave detector in space, but have not yet reported a single gravity wave. However, by simply watching the solar X-ray data, I have witnessed hundreds of separate gravity wave incidents passing through our solar system.

It is clear what the problem is. If gravity waves are ripples in space-time, and they arrive before gamma rays do, then the fabric of space-time must be very real and independent from photons. Or in other words, there really must be an Aether in which photons travel and which can be mechanically modulated separate from electromagnetic radiation.

Light exerts force on matter

2007-03-29T09:57:00.000-05:00

In our paper, A New Foundation for Physics, we provide a simple equation showing that photons exert force over an area. The equation is written:

phtn = forc * area

Light is further quantified as photon times frequency:

ligt = phtn * freq

We give the example of the Crooke's radiometer for the above equations. As photons strike the surface of the radiometer vanes they impart angular momentum, which manifests as force over an area. Since the black vanes absorb light (photons) and the silver vanes reflect light, the angular momentum is transfered to the dark vanes more than the silver vanes, thus resulting in the spinning.

Scientists at the University of Chicago have now used laser light to exert a force on soapy water, which creates a jet stream within the water. In the case of the soapy water, the surfactant in the soap apparently breaks down the binding force between water molecules, thus allowing them to move relative to each other with much less resistance. The naturally absorptive water then absorbs photons, which exerts force upon an area the width of the laser beam. The force pushes the freely moving water molecules into motion relative to surrounding water molecules.

The same effect occurs with sunlight shining on asteroids. A recent news release on EurekAlert describes an observation of the YORP effect on a near Earth asteroid.

YORP is a torque due to sunlight shining on the surfaces of asteroids and meteoroids and warming their surfaces, leading to a gentle recoil effect as the heat is emitted.

The "official" explanation of "a gentle recoil effect as heat is emitted" is nonsense as heat does not inherently have mass, nor is heat capable of causing motion. Heat is the measure of temperature associated with distributed motion within a medium, heat is not the motion's cause. The cause of a change in motion is the force associated with collision of bodies with mass.

In the Standard Model, the photon is considered to be massless. In the Aether Physics Model, the photon is said to have "net zero mass." There is a big difference between the two concepts. In the Standard Model there is no mass at all. In the Aether Physics Model a photon possesses half angular momentum due to electrons and half angular momentum due to positrons. The equal portions of electron and positron angular momentum cancel each other out, yet both angular momenta remain within the photon.

Thus, when a photon is absorbed into an appropriate atom it can produce electrons, positrons, or both, depending upon the atomic structure. In any case, when the photon is absorbed into an atom it exerts a force upon an area, as several physical observations in nature clearly demonstrate.

Electron Binding Energy Equation

2006-09-28T11:46:00.001-05:00

Last night, I finally succeeded in developing the electron binding energy equation for the 1s orbitals of all the atomic elements. This is a major milestone in the Aether Physics Model, as it is our first completed equation showing quantum mechanics in our new and improved model of quantum physics.

The equation was derived using the principles and equations already developed in the Aether Physics Model. This has strongly raised my hopes that the nuclear binding energy and atomic spectral equations will soon follow. Now that I understand the geometry of subatomic binding in atoms, it is just a matter of time before a complete and unequivacal model of quantum structure is known to the world.

Today, I have started writing the paper, which will be submitted to various journals. I'll keep you informed of the progress.

New Edition of Infinite Energy Magazine now Available

2006-09-25T11:57:00.000-05:00

The September/October 2006 edition of Infinite Energy magazine is now available online:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/

Infinite Energy Magazine Article

2006-09-23T15:26:00.000-05:00

I just received my proof copy of Infinite Energy Magazine volume 12, issue 69. The editors did a fine job of presenting our paper, A New Foundation for Physics. However, I was much more pleased with the other articles and authors in the magazine.

The article immediately preceeding ANFP was written by Dr. Cynthia Kolb Whitney, a very qualified physicist and mathematician from MIT. Her article is titled, "Is Optical Detection of Linear Velocity Possible?" She systematically reveals four specific experiments, which do not support Einstein's Special Relativity Theory, and also points out a valid complaint about Einstein specifically excluding acceleration of the coordinate system from his theory. By excluding acceleration, he excluded the rotation of the coordinate system, which means that any experiment performed on the surface of the Earth is effectively disqualified, thus making SRT untestable.

What is really exciting is that Dr. Whitney's article primes the reader's interest in an Aether theory, which is followed immediately by the Aether Physics Model.

I am even more excited by the fact that I personally discussed the Aether Physics Model briefly with Dr. Whitney at the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory conference in London, last week. I had no idea her article would precede our article in the same issue. In her presentation at the conference, she mentioned a decades old hypothesis that the photon always maintains a connection to its source. The Aether Physics Model reveals this exact same photon structure, that the photon always remains connected to its source, and this connection is quantified by the Compton function of 1-cos(theta).

I really have to hand it to Christy Frazier, the managing editor of Infinite Energy Magazine, for putting together a well synchronized issue.

I'm now looking forward to reading the rest of the magazine. BTW, the magazine's web site is http://www.infinite-energy.com/.

PIRT Conference a Success

2006-09-19T13:42:00.000-05:00

We thank Dr. M.C. Duffy for inviting us to the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory conference to present our paper, A New Foundation for Physics. More than 50 engineers, physicists, and chemists presented their own papers. Several of the papers presented related in some way to the Aether Physics Model, and we are following up by studying these papers in greater detail.

For some reason, the papers of all the physicists were not made available before the conference. This made it somewhat difficult for us to prepare for other's presentations, and others to prepare for ours. However, due to some last minute networking, we managed to find several scientists interested in looking further into the Aether Physics Model. These scientists, in turn, have put us in contact with yet others who have been working along similar theories.

In addition, our paper will be published with the conference proceedings, which will allow future researchers to further investigate the theory.

It is only fair to say that not everybody was interested in the Aether Physics Model. One scientist refused to even discuss the theory with me, simply because I did not have a degree. It was a stark reminder that some scientists are just as prejudiced in person, as they are on the Internet. But such trivial setbacks are meaningless when 12 others listened with interest. Perhaps others would have shown more interest in the theory if it weren't for the language barriers.

Still, we would have been delighted to have just one person show deep interest. To have 12 scientists show interest was very good.

We are now busy following up on all the new knowledge we encountered, and also actively discussing the theory with several qualified scientists. Stay tuned for new developments.

We're Going to London!

2006-09-04T08:33:00.000-05:00

Jim Bourassa and I have been invited to speak at the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory (PIRT) conference in London this week. The conference is held at Imperial College, runs from September 8 - 11, and includes dozens of Relativity scientists from around the world. According to the PIRT brochure, the purpose of the conference is:

"The object of the conference is to examine physical theories, models, and interpretations of the accepted Relativistic Formal Structure, including recently proposed ether-type theories and analogues. It is intended to review the fruitfulness of orthodox Relativity, as developed from the Einstein-Minkowski formulation, and to suggest how history and philosophy of science clarify the relationship between the accepted relativistic formal structure and the various physical interpretations associated with it."

Our presentation will outline the highlights of the Aether Physics Model as explained in our white paper, A New Foundation for Physics. It includes a PowerPoint presentation and brochure, which we intend to distribute before the talk.

Jim and I are very grateful for being invited and believe we will deliver exactly what physicists have been looking for, even if it isn't what the mainstream wanted to see.

Those who have been following the development of the Aether Physics Model, know we have quantified the structure of space-time as Aether from the same empirically derived constants used by modern physics. We also have quantified matter, itself. And to complete our physical Theory of Everything, we have also unified all the forces into a simple, Newtonian type Unified Force Theory.

We will be making history as we present to the scientific community the final fundamental theory of how physical matter began. The Aether Physics Model ties together all the previous fundamental discoveries and adds the remaining, and previously missing, strong force laws.

We also explain that General Relativity has an electrical analog, in addition to the mechanical analog presented by Albert Einstein. General Relativity does not supersede Sir Isaac Newton's gravitational law, but quantifies the effects of stretched space-time, which is caused by nuclear binding. Condensed nuclear binding is directly the cause of high mass density, which corresponds to the stretching of the fabric of space-time (Aether).

We are looking forward to exchanging ideas and making new contacts with the esteemed physicsists, mathematicians, and philosophers who will be in attendance.

Universe is Older than Expected

2006-08-07T13:20:00.000-05:00

In Secrets of the Aether, we suggest the Universe did not arise from a single Big Bang event, but rather is a constant "slow bang" caused by some regions of the Universe expanding and others collapsing. Matter is seething in and out of existence constantly.

Now new evidence has surfaced showing the Hubble constant could be off by as much as 15%, thus making the Universe 15% older than previously believed. According to the Aether Physics Model, the Hubble constant should vary for different regions of the Universe. A recent article at Space.com highlighting the work of Alceste Bonanos provides evidence for this hypothesis.

The new method took 10 years to develop and relied on optical and infrared measurements gathered from telescopes all around the world. The researchers looked at a binary star system in M33 where the stars eclipsed each other every five days. Unlike single stars, the masses of paired stars can be precisely calculated based on their movements. With knowledge of the stars' masses, the researchers could calculate their true luminosities, or how bright they would appear if they were nearby.
The difference between the true luminosity and the observed luminosity gives the distance between the stars and Earth. The team's results suggested that the stars were about 3 million light-years from Earth—or about half-a-million light-years farther than would be expected using the commonly accepted Hubble constant value.

If further research shows the Hubble constant is different, depending on which galaxies it is derived from, then this would further support the "slow bang" hypothesis. If the Hubble constant is the same, regardless of where in the Universe it is derived from, then the "slow bang" hypthesis could not be correct.

Real holes?

2006-07-26T20:26:00.000-05:00

In a recent EurekaAlert press release:

Electronic devices are always shrinking in size but it's hard to imagine anything beating what researchers at the University of New South Wales have created: a tiny wire that doesn't even use electrons to carry a current.
Known as a hole quantum wire, it exploits gaps – or holes - between electrons. The relationship between electrons and holes is like that between electrons and anti-electrons, or matter and anti-matter.
The holes can be thought of as real quantum particles that have an electrical charge and a spin. They exhibit remarkable quantum properties and could lead to a new world of super-fast, low-powered transistors and powerful quantum computers.

In order for a hole to be exploited, it has to be real. The Aether Physics Model quantifies the quantum unit of space-time, which is a quantum rotating magnetic field. This quantum Aether unit has spin, magnetic polarity, and electrostatic polarity. The reason the Aether Physics Model can quantify the quantum Aether unit as a quantum rotating magnetic field is because there is real data to develop the equations from.

Modern physics will go out of their way to tell us that Aether does not exist, and yet as we read in this article, they end up building devices using properties of the Aether and call it a different name. In this case, Aether units are referred to as "holes," which is quite appropriate. The quantum rotating magnetic field is just that, a hole in which primary angular momentum can exist.

Where are all the black holes?

2006-07-26T20:13:00.000-05:00

In a recent EurekaAlert press release:

European and American scientists, on a quest to find super-massive black
holes hiding in nearby galaxies, have found surprisingly few. Either the black
holes are better hidden than scientists realised or they are lurking only in the
more distant universe.

Of course, an obvious explanation could be that super massive black holes do not exist. According to the Aether Physics Model, black holes are implosion events. Matter becomes so dense that it collapses a region of the Aether (space-time). But as the Aether collapses, all the matter is converted from visible matter to dark matter, since the space-time structure has been destroyed. Thus black holes should only exist for as long as it takes for the collapse to take place (minutes, hours at most).

The concept of an ever growing black hole is reminiscent of the movie, The Blob. Probably the concept has caused many people to have nightmares in their sleep. The good news is that not only do black holes have a short life time, there is ample evidence that this is true.

According to the APM, the reason galaxies spiral inward is because matter is constantly collapsing a the most dense location, which is the center. As the Aether collapses in the center of the galaxy, surrounding Aether flows in to replace it, thus bringing more matter close together at the center. The effect is like having a drain in a bathtub. Visible matter is draining out of the visible Universe and returning to the sea of dark matter.

But don't worry about the galaxy running dry of visible matter. Visible matter is created all throughout the galaxy all the time, via the Casimir effect. The so-called "virtual" photons are not virtual at all, but real matter being created by converting dark matter to visible matter. New quantum Aether units are created at the same time.

Thus a galaxy spins because visible matter is draining out the center and being created in the outer regions, just like someone filling a bathtub with the drain plug removed.