On September 10, 2006, I spoke before the PIRT 2006 conference at Imperial College in London, UK.  I attended the conference on the suggestion of Prof. Ruggero Santilli and with the blessings of Prof. Michael Duffy.  In attendance, but not speaking at the conference, was Steven Weinberg, a physicist and professor from the University of Texas.

Dr. Weinberg received a Nobel Prize in physics for his so-called "Electroweak Theory."  Supposedly, Steven Weinberg mathematically unified the electric force with the weak interaction.  Much like Al Gore receiving a Nobel Prize for making a movie about a non-existent climate threat, Steven Weinberg received his prize for "unifying" a single force carrier to a fraction.  That is, if one knows the value of the fraction a/b, and also knows a, then they should be able to determine b.  But Weinberg could only "unify" a with a/b.

When I presented the Unified Force Theory before the PIRT 2006 conference, I identified the force carriers for all the fundamental forces and showed the so-called weak force was actually a ratio of the electrostatic force carrier to the strong force carrier.

The electrostatic force carrier is simply the electrostatic charge squared (e²).  The strong force carrier is a quantity of charge (e_emax² for the electron, e_pmax² for the proton, and e_nmax² for the neutron).  The gravitational force carrier is the mass of the particle.  The so-called "weak force" is actually the ratio, or proportion, or the electrostatic force carrier to the strong force carrier, which is equal to 8π times the fine structure of the subatomic particle.

For example, the force carriers for the electron unify as:

$$\frac{{{e^2}}}{{{e_{emax}}^2}} = 8\pi \alpha $$

Steven Weinberg essentially claims to unify the electrostatic force carrier to the ratio of the electrostatic/strong force carrier, but he could not determine the missing strong force carrier.  Weinberg is not pulling a scam, but his nonsense based upon the poorly structured Standard Model of Particle Physics is not worthy of science.

As chance would have it, Steven Weinberg arrived early on the first day of the conference with his wife.  I also arrived early on the first day with my cousin.  The four of us cordially exchanged greetings and he asked me which paper I was there to present.  After I mentioned my paper, he asked me what it was about.  I got about two sentences into explaining the Aether Physics Model when he interrupted and asked, "Where did you get your PhD in physics from?"  I explained that I did not have a PhD in physics.  He dryly replied, "I don't want to talk to you until you get a PhD in physics."  And that was the extent of our communication.

For some reason unexplained to me, my speaking time was moved from 10:00 am to 1:00 pm, just after lunch.  When it came time for my presentation, Steven Weinberg was absent and had invited half the conference participants to an extended lunch.

After the conference, it took nearly two years before the proceedings of the conference were published.  I asked Dr. Duffy (who was the conference organizer) if Steven Weinberg had a hand in the delay, but I never received a response.

PIRT 2006 was a conference for discussing the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory.  It was a conference whose participants tended to be outside of the mainstream and who attempted to extend the boundaries of known physics.

Steven Weinberg is an old-fashioned, anti-God, mainstream scientist who rails against anything outside of peer reviewed journals (of which he is a referee).  He had no interest in the theories presented at PIRT 2006 except to use his influence to derail a theory challenging his own half-baked Electroweak Theory, and which he received a Nobel Prize for.

His jealousy was so great, he could not bear to see a high school graduate discover the true Unified Force Theory, which Albert Einstein desperately sought and for which he equally pursued in vain.  Much like the climate science scandal of 2010, Steven Weinberg uses his influence, backed by devious means, to suppress competing scientific theories in order to protect his investment in his personal career.

This behavior of Steven Weinberg is not unusual. It is a theme repeated throughout history, and of which many others have written.  An excellent paper explaining this human weakness is, "Orthodoxy and Scientific Progress," by Bernard Cohen and available on Google.