|
According to NIST, the g-factor of the electron is:
and NIST gives the magnetic moment of the electron as:
The quantum dimensions equation for electron magnetic moment in single charge dimensions is:

According to NIST the electron gyromagnetic moment is given as a positive value by taking the absolute value of electron magnetic moment, which was made negative by the negative g-factor for the electron. The negative value for the gfactor is supposedly based on the negative charge of the electron. But then what logic would make the neutron g-factor negative? Can the electron and neutron g-factors be negative from different causes? That doesn't seem likely. As seen below, there is no mathematical reason for the electron gfactor to be negative, but there is a possible reason for the neutron gfactor to be negative.
While researching the physics of time, I found that Phi and phi are related to time. Phi is the Golden Ratio. It turns out that the electron g-factor is due to the stretching of spacetime as the electron spins at the speed of light. Mathematically, the electron g-factor is:

and the proton g-factor is:

Giving the symbol Φ for Phi and φ for phi, a possible solution for the neutron gfactor is:

In the previous equations, notice how the electron g-factor is dependent upon electron magnetic moment, and electron magnetic moment is dependent on the electron g-factor. Modern science has not yet found the true cause of the g-factor.
Also, as described on the magnetic moment page, NIST appears to have messed up on the value of the neutron magnetic moment and neutron g-factor as well.
Reference:
Eric W. Weisstein scienceworld.wolfram.com The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty
|